Qualifications Services How It Works Why Us FAQ Order Now

5OS01 Specialist Employment Law explores key areas of employment legislation and the legal framework, highlighting how people professionals must consider and apply legal requirements across different jurisdictions when carrying out the diverse aspects of their role.

Assessment Questions

AC 1.1 A fellow people management officer estimates that 20% or so of her working days are taken up with activity that is created as a result of regulations. She states this is time she would prefer to spend more productively improving the employment experience that the Trust provides. To help her understand why it is important to spend time dealing with issues that relate to employment law, send a reply that includes an evaluation of the aims and objectives of employment regulation.

Thank you for your email. I understand that managing regulatory compliance alongside your broader responsibilities can feel burdensome. However, the time invested in employment regulation is not unproductive; it is fundamentally protective and strategically valuable for the Trust.

The primary aim of employment regulation is to protect employees from exploitation, unfair treatment, and unsafe working conditions by establishing enforceable minimum standards that all employers must observe. The Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) provides foundational protections including unfair dismissal rights, the right to written terms, protection against unauthorised deductions from wages, and redundancy entitlements. The Equality Act 2010 prohibits discrimination on the basis of nine protected characteristics, ensuring that employment decisions within the Trust are based on merit rather than prejudice. The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 imposes a duty of care to ensure the physical and psychological safety of our workforce, which in a clinical environment is directly connected to patient safety.

A second aim is to balance the inherent power imbalance in the employment relationship. Without regulation, the employer’s superior bargaining position could lead to exploitative practices. Employment regulation creates a floor of rights that ensures employees are treated with dignity, paid fairly through National Minimum Wage legislation, provided with reasonable working conditions under the Working Time Regulations 1998, and given voice through the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004 (Lewis and Sargeant, 2023).

A third aim is to promote social justice and economic stability. Regulation addresses systemic inequalities, advances equal opportunities, and contributes to a productive economy by maintaining consumer spending power through fair wages and reducing the social costs of workplace injury and unemployment. The CIPD (2024) emphasises that effective compliance also protects the organisation from costly employment tribunal claims, reputational damage, and the operational disruption of legal proceedings.

Ultimately, the time you spend on regulatory compliance directly protects the Trust from substantial financial and legal risk, supports our duty of care to employees and patients, and underpins the fair, inclusive employment experience we aspire to provide. Regulatory compliance and a positive employment experience are complementary rather than competing objectives (Daniels, 2024). AC 1.2 You are asked to brief a senior manager in your team about the status of judgements made by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) prior

ior to the UK’s departure from the European Union in 2020. Do these remain good law? Are they still binding on the UK courts? Or can they now be disregarded? He asks for an example by way of illustration.  Thank you for raising this important question. The status of European Court of Justice (ECJ) judgements made prior to the UK’s departure from the EU on 31 December 2020 requires careful explanation because it is nuanced and evolving. Under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, the body of EU law as it existed at the end of the transition period was incorporated into UK domestic law as ‘retained EU law.’ This included ECJ judgements that interpreted the EU directives and regulations underpinning significant areas of UK employment law, including discrimination, working time, TUPE, and agency worker rights. Initially, these retained ECJ decisions had binding authority equivalent to UK Supreme Court decisions, meaning that lower courts and tribunals were required to follow them. However, the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (REUL Act) significantly altered this position. Under the REUL Act, UK courts are no longer bound by retained EU case law and may depart from it when they consider it right to do so. The higher courts, specifically the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, and in some circumstances the Employment Appeal Tribunal, now have the power to depart from retained EU case law. This does not mean that pre-Brexit ECJ decisions are au...

Subscribe to Unlock

You\\\'ve found premium content. Subscribe to continue reading and browse everything else we offer.

Subscribe to Unlock