Qualifications Services How It Works Why Us FAQ Order Now

5OS07 Wellbeing at Work introduces workplace well-being and explains why it matters. It explores the relationship between work, health, and well-being, and looks at how organisations can manage well-being in practice and connect it to people management and wider organisational strategy. The unit also covers the key parts of well-being programmes, the stakeholders involved, organisational responsibilities, and the benefits of effective well-being management for both employees and employers.

Task 1: Understanding Wellbeing in the Workplace

AC 1.1 Evaluate two key ‘wellbeing’ theories,  including how they  can be applied to current issues of wellbeing in the workplace.

Theory 1: The PERMA Model (Seligman)

Seligman’s (2024) PERMA model, originating from positive psychology, identifies five essential elements of human flourishing: Positive Emotions (experiencing joy, gratitude, and contentment), Engagement (being fully absorbed in meaningful activities), Relationships (having supportive, authentic connections), Meaning (contributing to something greater than oneself), and Accomplishment (achieving goals and experiencing mastery). The model proposes that wellbeing is not merely the absence of illness but the active presence of these five elements.

Applied to current workplace issues, PERMA provides a comprehensive framework for addressing the post-pandemic wellbeing crisis. The CIPD (2024a) reports that stress-related absence has reached its highest level in over a decade, with workload, poor management, and lack of purpose cited as primary drivers. PERMA reframes wellbeing strategy from deficit-based interventions, such as reactive employee assistance programmes, to proactive flourishing-focused approaches. Organisations can enhance Positive Emotions through recognition and appreciation cultures, Engagement through job design that provides autonomy and challenge, Relationships through team-building and inclusive management, Meaning through connecting individual roles to organisational purpose, and Accomplishment through clear goals and development pathways. The model’s strength is its holistic, evidence-based approach; its limitation is that it may underemphasise systemic organisational factors such as workload and job insecurity that constrain individual flourishing regardless of personal resources.

Theory 2: The Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model (Bakker and Demerouti)

The JD-R model (Bakker and Demerouti, cited in Dewe and Cooper, 2024) proposes that employee wellbeing is determined by the balance between job demands, the physical, psychological, and organisational aspects of work that require sustained effort, and job resources, the aspects that help achieve goals, reduce demands, and stimulate growth. When demands consistently exceed resources, employees experience strain, burnout, and health deterioration through a health impairment pathway. When resources are sufficient, employees experience engagement, motivation, and positive outcomes through a motivational pathway.

This model is particularly applicable to current workplace issues including hybrid working, where new demands such as digital fatigue, boundary erosion, and isolation may not be matched by new resources such as digital literacy support, flexible scheduling autonomy, and virtual social connection. It is also directly relevant to the workload crisis in sectors such as healthcare and education, where chronic understaffing creates demand-resource imbalance at a systemic level. The JD-R model’s strength is its organisational focus: it locates wellbeing responsibility

in work design and organisational systems rather than placing the burden solely on individual resilience. Its practical value lies in providing a diagnostic framework: organisations can systematically audit the demands they impose and the resources they provide, identifying specific interventions that rebalance the equation (CIPD, 2024a). AC 1.2 Explain, with examples, how wellbeing can be managed to support  organisational goals. Wellbeing, when strategically managed, directly supports organisational goals across productivity, retention, reputation, and compliance dimensions. Reducing absence and presenteeism supports productivity goals. The CIPD (2024a) reports an average of 7.8 days’ absence per employee per year, with stress, musculoskeletal conditions, and mental health being the leading causes. Proactive wellbeing management, including manageable workloads, supportive management, and early-intervention occupational health services, directly reduces absence costs while addressing presenteeism, where employees attend work but perform below capacity due to ill health, which Deloitte (2024) estimates costs UK employers significantly more than absence. For example, an organisation implementing a comprehensive mental health strategy including Mental Health First Aiders, manager mental health awareness training, and a proactive employee assistance programme can measurably reduce mental health-related absence and improve productivity metrics. Supporting rete...

Subscribe to Unlock

You\\\'ve found premium content. Subscribe to continue reading and browse everything else we offer.

Subscribe to Unlock