Qualifications Services How It Works Why Us FAQ Order Now
CMI 526 Assignment Example

Introduction

Leadership practice is the observable behaviour through which people in positions of influence set direction, enable others and secure results. This assignment addresses that practice in three parts, following the structure of the unit. Task one gives an account of leadership practice at Northbank Digital, evaluates two theoretical approaches to responsible leadership, and analyses two internal and two external factors shaping how leaders behave. Task two examines the relationship between management and leadership and evaluates three leadership styles. Task three presents a report on the impact of leadership within the organisation.

The context is worth stating at the outset because it conditions everything that follows. A company that quadruples in size in four years promotes engineers into management faster than it can develop them. This mirrors the national position, where research conducted with YouGov found that 82 per cent of people entering management roles had received no formal management or leadership training (Chartered Management Institute, 2023).

Task 1: Leadership practice in an organisation

AC 1.1 Examine leadership practices within organisations

Leadership practices are the repeated activities through which leaders exert influence, distinct from the traits or styles they display. Examining them at Northbank Digital identifies five that recur across the management population.

Setting and communicating direction. Squad leads translate company objectives into quarterly team goals and explain the reasoning behind them. The practice is not the writing of goals, which is administrative, but the repeated act of connecting a specific piece of work to why it matters. Where this is absent, engineers optimise for technical elegance rather than customer outcome.

Delegating with authority. Leaders assign ownership of outcomes, not just tasks, and specify the decisions the owner may take alone. At Northbank this is formalised through a decision-rights convention distinguishing choices a squad may make, those requiring consultation and those reserved to the leadership group.

Developing others. Weekly one-to-ones, structured coaching conversations and growth frameworks that define what progression requires. This practice is the one most often displaced when delivery pressure rises, and its absence surfaces later as attrition rather than as an immediate performance problem.

Modelling behaviour. Leaders establish norms by what they do rather than what they publish. When a principal engineer publicly documented a production incident she had caused, the practice communicated more about acceptable conduct than the incident policy did.

Holding the boundary. Declining scope, protecting focus time and refusing commitments the team cannot meet. This is leadership practice because it involves absorbing pressure from above rather than transmitting it downward.

These practices are contingent rather than universal. A leader stabilising an underperforming squad weights direction-setting and performance management; a leader running a mature squad weights delegation and development. Examining practice therefore requires attention to the situation as well as the behaviour, a point developed at AC 3.4. Leadership practice is also distributed rather than confined to job titles: at Northbank, a staff engineer with no reports exerts substantial influence over technical standards through code review and architectural argument. AC 1.2

1.2 Evaluate the use of TWO theoretical approaches to responsible leadership Responsible leadership concerns the leader’s obligations beyond immediate performance, extending to employees, customers, wider society and future consequences. Two approaches are evaluated here. Ethical leadership. Developed principally by Brown and Treviño, this approach defines ethical leadership as the demonstration of normatively appropriate conduct through personal action and interpersonal relationships, combined with the active promotion of such conduct to followers through communication, reinforcement and decision making. It rests on social learning: followers observe the leader and imitate what they see rewarded. The strengths are considerable. The construct is behavioural and therefore observable, measurable and trainable, which distinguishes it from approaches that rely on inner virtue. It has a substantial empirical base linking ethical leadership to reduced misconduct, improved employee wellbeing and greater willingness to report problems. Its two-part structure, being a moral person and being a moral manager, is directly usable, because it identifies the common failure in which a leader of personal integrity never actually talks about ethics and so exerts no influence on anyone else’s conduct. The limitations are equally real. The approach presumes agreement about what counts as normatively appropriate, which dissolves in genuinely contested cases. In a payments busines...

Subscribe to Unlock

You\\\'ve found premium content. Subscribe to continue reading and browse everything else we offer.

Subscribe to Unlock